Issue 015/2005


As a former #8 of strong RMC rugby teams in the late 70s it is nice to hear that rugby is returning.  This will give cadets another option to pursue a team sport outside the intramural walls of RMC. I do hope this is a start to a re-evaluation of the recent restrictive nature of the RMC varsity athletics program. There are several sports that cadets could take part in programs outside of the intramural program that would be relatively low cost and with cadets being quickly competitive. I hope present college staff does not shy away from revisiting the issue. A wider range of sports outside the RMC intramural program can do nothing but improve the exposure cadets receive from Canadian society and the exposure they provide representing RMC and the CF. 

12524 Mikola Czich 


I would like to say thank you to The Commandant, BGen J Leclerc and the Senior Staff of RMC for reintroducing Rugby as an RMC Varsity sport. Rugby dates from the very beginning of RMC history-predating hockey and football due to the College British traditions. There have been a number of cancellations and reintroductions of the sport over the years. We are on the upswing today! The College had a great season last year, with three teams playing an interdivisional IM program, along with Queen’s third side. 

This participation rate nearly beats the old Royal Roads system where three intramural teams once played alongside the College Vancouver Island Rugby Union Second and Third Division Rep teams. With a Cadet Wing of about 300 in size, a lucky Cadet could get in three games a week, not counting the practices! No wonder Royal Roads developed the “Rugby Only” Light Duty medical chit. This ensured parades did not interfere with recuperation!

13731 Steve France 


As a former member of the pistol team and a high school rugby player I am glad to see the return of rugby even if it means the demise of Rep Pistol and Rifle.  I remember the years I was on the pistol team being down in the basement of the Old Gym with the fans going.  It was an old range in 1979, let alone 2005.  The pistol competition of highest interest to my team mates and I was the West Point competition, and then it was only to minimize the score by which we lost.  I remember our best shooter being able to beat only their worst shooter, even under those conditions.  I did enjoy the trip to West Point; they had the nicest indoor range I had ever shot at.  The Pointers enjoyed the trip to Kingston and relative civilization.  Nothing starts a day with a hangover off better than indoor shooting at 7 am (especially given we were out as late as permitted).   

In terms of value to the College and the experience for cadets I'm glad to see the return of rugby to the College.  I'm hoping that if there isn't a women's program in place already there soon will be one.  When I was at the College in the late '70's and early '80's the rugby program had a first and second team (no IM rugby) and there was a great deal of interest in the program.  It's a great team sport and I think the College and cadets will be far better served with an active rugby program than pistol or rifle. 

13189 Guy Warwick, Late of Mackenzie Sqn. 


Here in California, the US Marines play rugby because, as they say, it is in the “the warrior tradition”.   Glad to hear that RMC is returning to its roots. Rugby is also the most sociable game on the planet (unlike armadillo rugby).   

There is a lot for the Cadets to learn from that.  I hope that they will be able to contribute players to the Canadian team.   

RCNC 326 JK Kennedy, Royal Rodent 1949


While reflecting on John's comments, ( Ed - just above) especially the first sentence of the second paragraph, I had memories of sitting after the game in an 18 inch deep and 12 x 12 foot bath of hot water along with a dozen or so other players, both ours and theirs, with a mug of bitters in my hand.  A truly sociable game...  Well said, John. 

RCNC 327 Rip Kirby 

Perhaps we could combine both sports rather than scrap one. Give each rugby player a sidearm. We’d establish some instant respect in our first season. 

8572 Raymond S. Riddell


Great to see that some logic has crept into the decision making process at RMC in regards to varsity sports.  Rugby was one of the only sports that RMC fielded a competitive team in within the OUAA and I feel that RMC will be competitive almost immediately.   It fits into the model of a cadet at RMC - tough and demanding combined with some skill and good looks. 

Besides the athletic benefits - the Rugby team always had the most fun on their trips!!!! 

16945 Rob Burke - Class of 89 - RMC Rugby 87-89, Roads Rugby 85-87


 

Shooting Teams  views

Mixed views. I am delighted that intercollegiate rugby is back.  It should never have gone!  It is a good sport for anyone and a good military sport.

I am appalled at the cancellation of indoor shooting, instead of bringing the range up to specifications.  This is a forces-wide problem that has not been handled well.  We have spent millions on simulation for instruction which is exactly what small bore shooting on indoor ranges is.  Moreover, it is probably the only actual military skill taught/practiced at RMC.  Good grief! 

6250 Lou Grimshaw 


It is an odd irony that the e-Veritas announcement of the elimination of the shooting team at RMC would come in the same issue as a trivia question that highlights an ex-Cadet who won three gold medals for shooting while still in attendance at RMC, and who was inducted into the Canadian Forces Hall of Fame for that very same thing. 

Shooting, like Rugby, requires a high degree of physical fitness.  Shooting, unlike Rugby, is a military skill - a skill that is not well exercised for those members that are not in the combat arms.  As a former captain of the RRMC rifle team, it saddens me to see the shooting team eliminated in favour of resurrecting a ball team when that money could be spent supporting a team that promotes a militarily useful skill.  

16078 P.D. Cowan


I am extremely disappointed with the decision to cancel the shooting team.

This was one of the few teams open to both male and female cadets.  It is also one of the few teams that one truly expects to have at a military college.  I have fond memories of the various holiday shooting events that the shooting teams hosted.

When I was a cadet, I found there was a definite shortage of shooting opportunities available to cadets.  Before going to RMC, I had expected marksmanship to be a regular part of the College curriculum. 

I believe team funding should be directly proportional to the level of success that such a team can reasonably expect to achieve.  Since our shooting team usually produces champions, they should be fully funded.  Any team that is not competing at the College and University level or higher, should be cancelled.  Any team that does not make it to the playoffs at least once every four years, should be cancelled. 

If the cadets have to use facilities on the base to train, so be it.  If a fund-raising effort needs to be made to refurbish the College range, that would be a worth-while effort of the Ex-Cadet Club. 

16923 C.E.M. (Beth) Webster

 

 

  Back to Issue #15