Issue 018/2005


Update Joe Grozelle Case
Mystery man contacts police...cont'd

Investigators said the man handed the poster to a female clerk at the information desk.  

OPP investigators took the unusual step of issuing a clear photo of the man, snapped by the store’s surveillance camera, in hopes that he would come forward.  

Ecclestone said the man was surprised when his picture was splashed across the front pages of newspapers in Ontario, including The Whig-Standard yesterday.  

“He had no idea until the story was published with his picture that anybody was looking for him for any reason,” the lawyer said. Ecclestone said the man immediately contacted police, who interviewed him for about 15 minutes yesterday afternoon inEcclestone’s office.  

The man co-operated fully with police, who took a videotaped statement, Ecclestone said.

“He’s definitely in no way a suspect,” Ecclestone said. “The police are not interested in talking to him any further.”  

The man spoke with The Whig-Standard yesterday from his lawyer’s office, but declined to give his name.

“He doesn’t want his name published, he has already had lots of calls and privacy issues as a result of the picture being released,” Ecclestone said.  

“He wanted to make sure there was a story of equal prominence indicating he came forward right away and co- operated fully with police and is not being sought for any reason.”  

In an interview with The Whig, the man said on Oct. 29, 2003, he was headed to Canadian Tire, where he’s a regular customer, when a friend phoned him and mentioned that he had heard on the radio that investigators had called off the search for Grozelle.  

The man said he spotted a missing poster depicting Grozelle that was prominently displayed in the store.  

Believing the search had been called off and that investigators had possibly found Grozelle, he said he felt the family shouldn’t be faced with photos of their son plastered all over the city.  

He said he took the poster down and handed it to a clerk and told her that perhaps the store should check whether the poster still needed to be up.  

“All he said was that the search had been called off and the poster may no longer be necessary,” Ecclestone said.  

“He was just relaying information that was publicly available.”  

Investigators from the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service didn’t call off the search for

Grozelle until Oct. 31, 2003. Police divers returned to the search the water on Nov. 4.

The body of the 21-year-old cadet washed up in the Inner Harbour on Nov. 13, 2003.  

The lead OPP investigator, Det.-Insp. Ian Grant, confirmed that police had interviewed a man they believed to be the person from the photograph and that they interviewed him at his lawyer’s office.  

“We spoke to the unidentified man and we believe he is the right person,” Grant said. “The person is still just a witness, nothing has  changed.”  

He said the information the man provided didn’t raise any red flags for investigators and he didn’t expect that police would interview the man again.  

“There’s nothing untoward about the information,” Grant said. “He did provide a logical explanation from our point of view.”  

The man told The Whig that he put his innocuous comment to the store clerk out of his mind until yesterday, when he was inundated with calls from as far away as Ottawa and Toronto after his photo appeared in the paper.  

The callers included one person who threatened to to turn him in to police, despite the fact investigators said he wasn’t a suspect.  

When he realized he was the man police were looking for, the man said he immediately called the Frontenac OPP and then called Ecclestone to set up the interview with police.  

He said he called police so that the Grozelle family would have some peace of mind knowing that there wasn’t someone out there withholding important information about their son.  

The man said he was upset that police went to the lengths they did to find him. Although investigators stressed that he wasn’t a suspect, he said people viewed him with suspicion after his photo was published.  

“A lot of people don’t read further than the headline, especially a big headline and a big picture,” his lawyer said.  

Grant said he still believes police did the right thing by releasing the photo.  

“You couldn’t have an action of somebody coming in two weeks before Joe Grozelle’s body was located and do something of that nature – taking down the poster – and not say [to yourself], ‘Why would that person be doing that when [the search] is still going on?’ ” Grant said.  

“But by the other side of the coin, I don’t know everything that was done or the press that was out at that time.”

  Back to Issue #18